TED Blog: TED2007: Day one wrap-up

07 March 2007

TED2007: Day one wrap-up

Quotes of the day:

Cassini imaging team head Carolyn Porco: "So there are possibly liquid water, organic materials and excessive heat on Saturn and its moons. Which means that Saturn could be a place were life is possible. ~~If we can demonstrate that Genesis has happened not once (Earth) but twice (Saturn) then we can infer that it has happened hundreds of thousands of times across the solar system.~~ If we can demonstrate that Genesis has happened not once [on Earth] but twice [including Saturn] in the solar system, then by inference that means it has occurred a staggering number of times across the universe in its 13.7 billion year history".

Nobel prize of physics Murray Gell-Mann: "In fundamental physics, beauty is a very successful criterion for choosing the right theory".

Psychologist Steven Pinker: "The truth is that our ancestors were far more violent that we are, and today we are probably living in the most peaceful times in history".

Computer scientist Jeff Han: "We basically have to un-teach people what they have learned so far about computing, and convince them that they can use several fingers, that several people can work on the screen at once".

Architect Philippe Starck: "I believe in general that my job is absolutely useless; but now, after Carolyn and these guys, I feel like shit".

Statistician Hans Rosling: "Bring me my sword!" (Rosling is a serious demographer but he is also -- another deadly serious activity -- one of the few sword-swallowers active in Sweden, and he ends his speech swallowing a Swedish bayonette).

Posted by Bruno Giussani | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c4e5853ef00d8342d094853ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference TED2007: Day one wrap-up:

» Ted 2007 : informel à l'américaine from pointblog.com
TED (Technology Entertainment Design), c'est une série de conférences qui se déroulent, ces jours-ci à Monterey, au sud de San Francisco sur la côte. TED existe depuis une vingtaine d'années, et appartient à une fondation (lancée par Chris Anderson)... [Read More]

Comments

> Nobel prize of physics Murray Gell-Mann:
> "In fundamental physics, beauty is a very successful criteria
> for choosing the right theory".

Murray Gell-Mann doesn't know that 'criteria' is plural? There's hope for us all.

Posted by: Author | 08 March 2007 at 01:18 AM

Good catch Paul: but Murray knows. My mistake. High-speed note-taking and post-writing. Corrected

Posted by: Bruno Giussani | 08 March 2007 at 01:59 AM

Greetings,

I'm a big fan of Pinker's work on language and found his piece on the "History of Violence" published in The New Republic particularly interesting.

In The Third Side, William Ury also investigates pre-historical evidence of mass violence. He finds that australopithecines and two species of early humans — Homo erectus and Homo habilis — are known to have shared the same habitats in Africa from two and a half million years ago to a million and a half years ago, yet the fossil record reveals no evidence of violence having occurred between them. Drawing on the work of the world-renowned anthropologist Louis Leaky, Ury learns that, “in the old hunting days we were too busy making a living […] And you didn’t really have that much energy left at night for going out and quarreling with a neighbor. Maybe in a cave, with your close neighbor. But going fifteen miles away to get into battle –nonsense. You might lose someone you needed for getting then next day’s hunt.”

Direct violence is on the decline, but how about structural violence and systemic risk or simply vulnerability and human security? Which is worse, direct or structural violence? In the Western/Christian tradition, conflict resolution is about alleviating immediate pain. In the Arab/Muslim tradition, the focus is on justice. In “Les Damnés de la Terre,” Frantz Fanon argued that the major weapon of the colonizers was the imposition of their image of the colonized on the subjugated people.

I would suggest that the powerlessness of a citizen who has been rendered a dysfunctional spectator by the repressive polices crafted by an elite is not qualitatively different from vulnerability to physical violence during conflict. Peter Uvin’s recent field research in Burundi suggests that local communities tend to view peace in structural terms. “When the stomach is not full, there can be no peace” was a common refrain he heard. Poverty is increasing, not even stabilizing in the developing world. In other words, structural violence is on the rise.

Also, the recent literature on Fourth Generation Warfare suggests that this type of warfare poses a greater threat to peace and security than previous forms of warfare. In any case, the reduction in direct violence may perhaps reflect an ‘evolution’ in warfare, ie, a change in tactics to pursue strategies more “efficiently.” One no longer has to eliminate large numbers of people to influence foreign policy. My suggestion is that part of the decline in war casualties is due to a shift in warfare tactics that reflect not higher morals but a question of more efficient tactics to meet one’s goal, eg, global insurgency, etc.

Finally, the fact that the nuclear weapons used against Japan killed some 100,000 individuals in a matter of minutes makes me think we are no less peaceful in a qualitative sense. The temporal component, the fact that it may no longer take 30 years of war to kill 100,000’s of people but now just a matter of minutes is for me a higher scale and more indiscriminate form of violence. I don’t see our era as any less barbaric.

Posted by: Patrick Meier | 22 March 2007 at 10:50 AM